How can we distinguish between good and bad interpretations? Discuss with reference to the arts and one other area of knowledge.
Interpretation creates disputes because the explanations or opinions of what something means could be widely differing. The rules about interpretations are vague and they lack a linear approach. Both, good and bad, are subjective. Therefore, good and bad interpretations can coexist despite statistical evidence, and significant testing and may have unfortunate consequences because they are not straightforward.
Art is quite a diverse discipline and due to its methods of interpretation, there are very often dissimilarities yet fruitful discussions whereas human science is a matter of humans, their beliefs, and perspectives. In art, good and bad interpretation lies in culture, values, role of critics, and expertise however human science rests on the values we hold and the culture we are raised in.
Art has a function and its social character plays an important role because art is a strong medium to bring about social change. Human science is complex and faces multicultural responsibilities which are solved through research persuasion on humans. What remains interesting to explore is that humans share basic tenets across all species and may have little room for good and bad interpretations as against arts as diverse interpretation are deemed obvious.
To explore good and bad interpretations in human science, it is important to know the beliefs and interests of human scientists and to what extent they influence conclusions?