This table of contents will guide you through the dynamic exploration of knowledge, its foundations, from belief and truth to bias and ethics, challenges, and the role of knowers in shaping and understanding the world. You would surely get to understand how comprehensive the content is helping you to structure your lesson plans on each aspect of the relationship between knowledge and the knower, incorporating TOK concepts, perspectives, and practical implications.
Table of Contents (3 teaching hours)
- Introduction to Knowledge and the Knower
- Defining Knowledge and Its Connection to the Knower
- Knowledge as More Than Critical Thinking: Seeking and Scrutinizing Answers
- Importance of Understanding Knowledge in Social and Individual Contexts
- Defining Knowledge
- Justified True Belief (JTB) Model of Knowledge
- Justification: Coherence and Clarity
- Truth: Correspondence with Reality
- Belief: Owning Knowledge as a Conviction
- Exploring Truth, Belief, and Information in Relation to Knowledge
- Justified True Belief (JTB) Model of Knowledge
- Information vs. Knowledge
- Definition and Characteristics of Information
- Transforming Information into Knowledge: Verification and Validation
- Role of Evidence in Establishing Knowledge
- Knowledge and Belief
- Differences Between Knowledge and Belief
- Role of Truth in Distinguishing Knowledge from Belief
- Subjective vs. Objective Nature of Knowledge and Belief
- Pattern Recognition in Knowledge Formation
- Patternicity: Connecting Meaningful and Meaningless Patterns
- Errors in Pattern Recognition:
- Type 1 (False Positive)
- Type 2 (False Negative)
- False Knowledge and Its Implications
- Defining False Knowledge: The Absence of Verification or Truth
- Examples of False Knowledge: Misleading Claims in Nutrition and Media
- What is Truth?
- Correspondence Theory: Alignment with Reality
- Coherence Theory: Fit Within a Web of Belief
- Pragmatic Theory: Truth as Utility
- Evolution of Truth Over Time: Revising Knowledge
- Perspectives in Knowledge
- Defining Perspective: Shaped by Context, Culture, and Experience
- Individual vs. Shared Perspectives
- Importance of Considering Diverse Perspectives in Knowledge Evaluation
- Bias in Knowledge and Decision-Making
- Definition of Bias and Its Cognitive Roots
- Types of Biases:
- Confirmation Bias
- Illusion of Control
- False Uniqueness and Egocentric Bias
- Media’s Role in Bias Formation:
- Propaganda, Cherry-Picking, and Echo Chambers
- Role of the Knower in Knowledge Creation
- Who is a Knower?
- Individual Knowers vs. Communities of Knowers
- Influence of Social and Historical Contexts on Knowledge
- The Social Ecosystem of Knowledge
- Communities of Knowers: Shared Language, Cultural Values, and Perspectives
- Creation, Review, and Dissemination of Knowledge in Groups
- Interplay Between Individual and Collective Knowledge
- TOK’s Core Exploration of Knowledge
- Encouraging Questions Over Acceptance of Authority
- Provisional Nature of Knowledge: Examples from Science and Arts
- Fact-Checking and Validating Knowledge Claims
- Ethics and Responsibility in Knowledge
- Moral Implications of Knowledge Claims
- Role of Media and Authority in Ethical Knowledge Dissemination
- Conclusion: Knowledge and the Knower in TOK
- Understanding Knowledge as Dynamic and Evolving
- Role of Individual and Community in Shaping Knowledge
- Navigating Bias, Perspective, and Truth in the Pursuit of Knowledge
What is knowledge?
There is a deep and strong connection between knowledge and knower. To establish the connection between knowledge and the knower, it is pragmatic to know that knowledge does not necessarily mean an outcome of critical thinking but it does involve seeking answers to questions. The answers often require evidence however sometimes we make judgments on the information without much effort of scrutinizing and dissecting it. We often believe information as knowledge at its face value. Remember, that most knowledge is not contestable because it is for certain.
Knowledge essentially means how well we know things around us. Some might say that it is aware of who we are, what we do, where we come from and our existence along with other objects, thoughts, people, and various other things.
Many of us, in our daily conversations, consider and expect others to know basic things. This is often an outcome due to giving immense importance to common sense. We, a face value, expect others’ experiences to be the same as ours however no two people or two situations can yield exact similarities. In fact, most of us are victims of bias as we are surrounded by others’ opinions with very little room for our own original point of view.
Knowledge is justified true belief. For the JTB model to hold, knowledge must be:
JUSTIFIED: The knowledge claim is justified with adequate evidence. Justification requires Coherence with previous data and Clarity with regard to language and logic. There can be no contradiction or strong counter-evidence.
TRUE: The knowledge claim is True rather than False. It corresponds to the real world. It is a fact. It is “what is the case.”
BELIEF: The knowledge claim is a matter of conviction. We must own our knowledge.
When we question what is knowledge?, we will undoubtedly stumble upon the question ‘What is truth?’ ‘What is belief?’ ‘What is information?’
Even though there may not be a satisfying catch-all the answer, different theories attempt to offer a response. This is an essential element to form a connection between the knowledge and knower.
To understand knowledge and the knower we need to throw light on our role in acquiring knowledge in a social ecosystem. Our past experiences and belief system make us ask questions about the real world. We, as individuals and social beings, shape up our knowledge through individual inquiry and social interactions. As we gather the pieces of information from the world, we aim to verify this information. The social interactions make us question the information we acquire and trigger each to look into it through the different perspective lenses of each other. It is therefore essential to seek answers to the following questions before we move ahead.
Difference between information and knowledge
Information is data, true or false, on an object or a person. The fragments of information may lack connectedness.
Knowledge is information gained through education or experience and hence is verifiable. So, knowledge is a combination of information, insight, and experience. The fragments of information are connected to form ‘knowledge’, a mental map of wholesome ideas in drawing conclusions. The knowledge and the knower goeas through the information that must be verified and validated through evidences or/and in some cases evidences are limited and do not qualify as evidences. The knowledge and the knower cannot make effective connections due to problems of knowledge. Therefore, information in isolation, is not sufficient to establish the bond between them. Learners and instructors are expected to cross-verify the source of the information, its credibility, what value it brings to the knower.
Knowledge and belief
To understand the difference between knowledge and belief, we consider truth as the distinguishing marker. If you have knowledge in something, your claim must be true when verified in real-life scenario. However, if you believe in something it might be true or false in reality. So, knowledge is verifiable claim, while belief is an opinion which is not verifiable. Hence, belief can be false, but knowledge cannot be false.